Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Borden v. Brady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1983Published

1Concurrence

Yesawich, Jr., J.,

concurs in the following memorandum. Yesawich, Jr., J.

(concurring). I concur in the result reached, but disagree with the majority’s view of the state of the law respecting the extent to which an expert’s opinion may be predicated on hearsay. In a marked departure from the traditional rule that expert opinion testimony must be based on material in evidence (see People v Keough, 276 NY 141, 146), the Court of Appeals in People v Sugden (35 NY2d 453, 460) declared that a medical expert “may rely on material, albeit of out-of-court origin, if it is of a kind accepted in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SugdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. KeoughNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Iannucci v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Salathiel v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API