Hurst v. Munson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Washington Chancery Court; Ben F. McMahan, Chancellor; 1. The clerk’s certificate is conclusive as to the recitals therein.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Washington Chancery Court; Ben F. McMahan, Chancellor; 1. The clerk’s certificate is conclusive as to the recitals therein. C. & M. Dig., % 10085; 55 Ark. 218; 68 Id. 248; 140 U. S. 634. And the appellees will not lie permitted, in their effort to show that the tax sale was not advertised for full two weeks as required by law, to show that the date, “May 27th,” was interlined after the sale was had. 81 Ark. 319. 2. The date, June 16, 1915, in the attestation clause of the clerk’s certificate, is not conclusive of the date when the certificate was recorded. The attestation clause…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
The subject-matter of this controversy is a tract of land, containing 55 acres, in Washington County. Appellees held under the original title, having purchased and received a conveyance from the heirs of one Deering, who formerly owned and actually occupied said tract of land as a farm. Appellant claims title under a forfeiture to the State in the year 1915 for the taxes of 1914.
There was a forfeiture to the State, and on October 30, 1917, Mrs. J. T. Nelson purchased the land at $1.25 an acre from the State Land Commissioner and received a deed of conveyance. She subsequently sold and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Logan v. Eastern Arkansas Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Hunt v. GardnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Cook v. Ziff Colored Masonic Lodge No. 119Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Earl v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cecil v. Tisher and FriendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Alphin v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Luebke v. HoltzendorffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Boyd v. MeadorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.