City of Fort Scott v. Arbuckle
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
In each of these three cases the defendant was convicted in police court of disturbing the peace, in violation of a city ordinance. On appeal she was again found guilty on each charge. She has appealed. The cases were consolidated in the district court and have been consolidated on appeal.
Prior to submission in district court the city moved to dismiss each appeal on the ground the district court did not have jurisdiction to hear them because the defendant’s recognizances were not filed within ten days of the conviction in police court. Upon…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Tillson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- In re MoteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- People v. Reid, New York County Courts1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flores v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- City of Fort Scott v. ArbuckleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- State v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- State v. StrobleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Fischbach v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.