Legal Opinion
Harpley v. Ducane Industries (In Re Outdoor Products Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided June 21, 1995No. Bankruptcy No. 87-1039-8B7. Adv. No. 91-219PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE TRENAM, KEMKER LAW FIRM
THOMAS E. BAYNES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
THIS MATTER came on for consideration upon Dueane Industries’ Motion to Disqualify the Professional Association of Trenam, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye, O’Neill, and Mullins as legal counsel for Ralph Jay Harp-ley, Trustee. This Court has considered the evidence from the February 9, 1995, eviden-tiary hearing of Ducane’s motion to disqualify, and the record, and finds the facts as follows:
Debtor was brought into bankruptcy by an involuntary petition filed under Chapter 7 of Title 11 United States…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,017 Carl R. Duncan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. KAWSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Castro v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. StansburyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Ford v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BON SECOURS-MARIA MANOR v. SeamanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Canta v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- In Re WeinholdUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- Bancor Group Inc. v. RodriguezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023