S.W. Daniel, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, by and Through Its President Sylvia Daniel v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge:
S.W. Daniel, Inc. a manufacturer of firearms, brought this action against the Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter “IRS”) claiming entitlement to a refund of excise taxes paid on SSMII-AI’s. At trial S.W. Daniel, Inc., claimed that the IRS had improperly classified the 168 single-shot weapons as “machine guns”, and that as a result the Service had inappropriately levied $400 in taxes per gun. 1
26 U.S.C. § 5845 defines a machine gun broadly, including in its description: (1) “any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,862 G. A. Thompson & Co., Inc. v. Herbert Partridge, Robert M. Presley, Frank Andrews and C. Thomas MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Irma Dreiling, Widow of Leo McLelland v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- J.T. Gibbons, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Crawford Fitting Co., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Palmer v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Cosmo Ostapenko v. American Bridge Division of United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. One Trw, Model M14, 7.62 Caliber Rifle, Serial Number 1488973 From William K. Alverson, William K. Alverson, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Thompson/Center Arms Co. v. BakerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1988
- United States v. Aguilar-EspinosaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
- United States v. GravelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Sean Marquise Hughes v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.