Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. London
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 4, 1985No. 70154PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Appellee London filed a complaint against appellant Ford Motor Credit Company alleging that Ford, among other violations of plaintiff’s rights, had violated the Georgia Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act (OCGA § 10-1-30 et seq.) for a number of years by accelerating motor vehicle installment contracts according to the “Rule of 78” method when it should have computed interest on a pro rata method. She sought also to press the complaint as a class action under OCGA § 9-11-23 on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated.
In its answer, defendant objected to the suit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sta-Power Industries, Inc. v. AvantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Liner v. City of RossvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Williams v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Georgia Investment Co. v. NormanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Stevens v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Liberty Lending Services v. CanadaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- American Debt Foundation, Inc. v. HodzicCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Trend Star Continental, Ltd. v. BranhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.