Legal Opinion

Crisp v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1985No. 842DC836PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Of the two issues raised by this appeal the first is whether the court erred in concluding that defendant was not negligent in bringing about the collision sued for and that the doctrine of last clear chance does not apply. We are of the opinion that he did not and affirm the judgment.

Like a jury, the judge was at liberty to pick and choose from the evidence as he saw fit, and the findings and conclusions made are supported by recorded evidence which the court converted into findings of fact somewhat to the following effect: Plaintiffs car was situated diagonally across the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clodfelter v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tew v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Robinson v. ShueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Messina v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Hardesty v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API