Legal Opinion

State v. Hingley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Washington: Thos. A. McBride, Judge. The State of Oregon appeals from an order sustaining Hubert Hingley’s demurrer to an indictment for illegal voting at a school election.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

The defendant was indicted in the proper county for unlawfully voting at a legally authorized election in the state. The specification of the charge is that he voted at a school meeting of district No. 18, Washington County, Oregon, such meeting being for the election of a school director and clerk, he not being then and there a person having property in such district upon which he pays a tax, or children of school age to educate. A demurrer was interposed by the defendant, and sustained, and judgment rendered accordingly, from which the state appeals.

1. Two questions are presented by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. BurrOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lathen v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. School District No. 17 v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hammond v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Zeek v. Union School District No. 5Oregon Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API