Legal Opinion

In Re Vigil's Estate

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1934No. 3927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francisco Vigil died intestate. He left surviving him a widow (his second wife) and four children by his first wife. Pedro Ortiz, the appellee, as the surviving husband of Soledad V. de Ortiz, a deceased daughter of Vigil, claimed the share of the estate that Soledad would have inherited if she had outlived her father, pursuant to the provisions of Comp. St. 1929, § 38-108. Soledad died in April, 1906, leaving surviving her the said Pedro Ortiz, her husband, and an infant daughter, which infant daughter died in July or August, 1906.

The appellant, Cesarita V. de Garcia, one of the children of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helvering v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Commissioner of Immigration of Port of NY v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. McMenomy v. McMenomySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  5. Schultz v. SchultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Montoya v. McManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. CITATION BINGO, LTD. v. OttenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API