Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Washington v. Dilworth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1987No. D8408-66084; CA A40178PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

In this filiation proceeding, the state appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for respondent. It argues that errors were made in three separate evidentiary rulings which resulted in the admission of irrelevant and prejudicial evidence. We agree and reverse.

The state first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of its motion to exclude any reference to mother’s husband, Beeson. Mother was married to him on December 23,1977. In June, 1978, they separated. Respondent did not dispute mother’s testimony that, although she had stayed with Beeson at his home for three days in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Leonard v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Pershall v. WoolseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Pershall v. WoolseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Thirdgill v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Washington v. DilworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API