Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 29, 2013No. A13A0556PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Darius Darnell Haynes guilty of armed robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony based on his participation in a home invasion. The trial court denied Haynes’s motion for new trial. On appeal, Haynes contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of aggravated assault and that the trial court erred in failing to merge his aggravated assault conviction into his armed robbery conviction for purposes of sentencing. For the reasons set forth below, we agree *58with Haynes that the trial court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Drinkard v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Long v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  5. Sears v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morris v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Mathis v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Jason Jermoine Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
  4. Javier Torres-Toledo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  5. Nathaniel Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API