Legal Opinion

In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Hughes & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOwen McGivern, J.

Motion to stay action is denied. The Republic of Argentina, concededly a foreign sovereign, has brought a plenary action in this court, alleging that its funds were converted by defendant Hughes & Company. Joined as defendants are officers and directors of the corporate defendant, who are accused of participating in the alleged conversion, and its assignee for the benefit of creditors. It is alleged that funds of the Republic have come into the hands of the assignee by virtue of the assignment.

The assignee moves in the assignment proceeding for an order enjoining the Republic from further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re General Assignment for Benefit of Creditors of Jamaica Concrete Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hynes v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abondolo v. Jerry WWHS Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API