Williams v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of playing craps. The State’s evidence discloses, through the witness Lee Williams, that he and defendant, in a side room of Dr. Williams’ store, played craps. While they were playing, or about the time they finished their game Jim Ballard came in the room and borrowed forty cents from appellant, and he and witness Lee Williams then engaged in a game of craps, but that defendant did not engage in that game.

1. Appellant offered Ballard as a witness in his behalf by whom he expected to prove, a's set out in the bill of exceptions, that neither…