Legal Opinion

Cassinelli v. Stacy

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 12, 1931PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson—

Reversing.

This action was instituted by Troy Stacy, as plaintiff, against Peter Cassinelli, as defendant, to recover the balance of $789.33 alleged to be due under a contract between them for the construction of a building at Duane, Ky. The contract consists of the original and two supplemental written agreements signed by the parties. It was provided in the original that for $7,000 to be thereafter paid, Troy Stacy was to furnish the material and labor necessary to complete the building, according to the plan and specifications which are made part of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bowen v. KimbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Handy v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Wallace v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. City of Newport v. Newport & Cincinnati Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  5. Escott v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Freeman Contracting Company v. LefferdinkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Vinaird v. Bodkin's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Weil v. B. E. Buffaloe & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Hager v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. Alph C. Kaufman, Inc. v. Cornerstone Indus. Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API