State v. Borough of Vineland
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On certiorari. The writ of certiorari has brought up the following ordinances of the borough of Vineland: “An ordinance for the construction and repair of sidewalks and for the trimming of shade trees within the borough of Vineland.
Read the full summary
On certiorari. The writ of certiorari has brought up the following ordinances of the borough of Vineland: “An ordinance for the construction and repair of sidewalks and for the trimming of shade trees within the borough of Vineland. “ Section 1. Be it ordained by the mayor and council of the borough of Vineland, That sidewalks upon all accepted streets, roads, avenues and public places in said borough, shall be constructed, repaired and kept in repair by the owner or owners of lands along which sidewalks are or may be located, as hereinafter' provided. 1 “ Section 2. And be it ordained and…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Magie, J.
A stipulation of the attorneys of the parties admits that the prosecutor is the owner of lands affected by the two supplements to the ordinance of the borough of Vineland, called “Ordinance No. 12,” which ordinance, with said supplements, appears in the statement prefacing this opinion.
It is unnecessary to consider prosecutor’s objections to Ordinance No. 12, because its provisions in no respect particularly affect him.
*269The supplements, one of which was passed June 13th, 1893, and the other of which was passed September-20th, 1893, do affect…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- Camden Horse Railroad v. West Jersey Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- Landis v. Borough of Sea Isle CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901