Legal Opinion

Peebles v. Canal Authority of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 2, 1971No. N-335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in an eminent domain proceeding in which appellants, the condemnees, were awarded, pursuant to jury verdict, the sum of $27,-200.00 for land taken by appellee.

Appellee filed eminent domain proceedings against numerous parties for the taking of land to be used for the Eureka Reservoir. At the trial of this cause, it was established that appellants owned an L-shaped tract of land totalling approximately 117 acres, of which 60.37 acres were taken by appellee. Said sixty acres had a total frontage on the Oklawaha River of about 1,700 feet.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houston Texas Gas & Oil Corporation v. HoeffnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. Smith v. City of TallahasseeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Belvedere Development v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Trailer Ranch, Inc. v. City of Pompano BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Belvedere Development Corp. v. Division of Administration, State Department of TransportationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Hillstrand v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Belvedere Dev. Corp. v. DIV. OF ADMIN., ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API