Legal Opinion

Nastasi v. St. Joe Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 2011No. 1D10-3793Published

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The appellants challenge the circuit court’s dismissal of the appellants’ civil action, upon a failure to prosecute. That action should not have been dismissed, as the appellants made a sufficient filing within the time required under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e).

The appellants commenced a civil action for damages, discovery ensued and various filings were made. After an initial period of inactivity, additional filings were made. After a subsequent ten-month period of inactivity, the court entered an order pursuant to rule 1.420(e), advising the appel*122lants that if no further…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chemrock Corp. v. Tampa Electric Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API