Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cameron v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1974No. 48150Published

1ConcurrenceOdom, Judge

I fully agree with the affirmance of this case. However, since this court is divided1 on the interpretation of this mandatory statute,2 I will express myself further on why I align myself with the majority.

Article 26.13, V.A.C.C.P., provides that:

“If the defendant pleads guilty, or enters a plea of nolo contendere he shall be admonished by the court of the consequences-, and neither of such pleas shall be received unless it plainly appears (to the trial court) that (1) he is mentally competent,3 and (2) is uninfluenced (a) *620by any consideration of fear, (b) or by any persuasion, (c) or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McClintick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Espinosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API