Legal Opinion
Orr Felt & Blanket Co. v. Sherwin Wool Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 15, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The first of these two actions is in contract, brought by the Orr Felt and Blanket Company (hereinafter spoken of as Orr) against the Sherwin Wool Company (hereinafter called Sherwin). The second action is in contract brought by Sherwin against Orr. Both actions arise from the same transaction. Orr manufactured blankets at Piqua, Ohio; Sherwin was engaged in the rag business in Boston. Orr had no machinery for making rags into shoddy, but agreed to buy rags from- Sherwin if he would have them *555made into shoddy for and on account of Orr. The process of malting rags into shoddy is known as “…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Everson v. Casualty Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- O'Shea v. VaughnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Alden v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Eveland v. LawsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- McKim v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tiedman v. American Pigment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Lander v. Samuel Heller Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Bouchard v. BouchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Ryder & Brown Co. v. E. Lissberger Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Jones v. SperingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.