Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re PATH at Stone Summit, Inc. (Concerned Neighbors, Appellants)

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 30, 2017No. 2016-298Published

1ConcurrenceDooley, J.

¶ 30. I fully concur in the opinion for the majority and join it. I write to make clear that this decision does not mean that Neighbors have been found to be interested parties who could participate in CON review procedures before the Board if they had sought intervention within time deadlines. An interested party is defined as "persons or organizations representing the interests of persons who demonstrate that they will be substantially and directly affected by the new health care project under review." 18 V.S.A. § 9440(c)(7). This relatively broad definition must be read in relation to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Professional Nurses ServiceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API