Legal Opinion
Ener v. Martin
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 21, 2019No. CASE NO. 19-CIV-21550-RARPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOLFO RUIZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter involves application of the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to bar Plaintiff, Johanna Maria Vibe Ener ("Ener"), from seeking relief in the Southern District of Florida. On April 26, 2019, Defendant, Pedro Martin ("Martin"), filed a Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint and Request for Expedited Ruling (the "Motion to Dismiss") [ECF No. 6 ], which maintains that Ener qualifies as a fugitive from prior court orders and, in effect, refuses to acknowledge the authority of Florida's Eleventh Judicial Circuit in a related…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Casale v. TillmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ofer v. MillanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
- Vibe Ener v. Korangy Publishing, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Vibe Ener v. Korangy Publishing, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020