Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
MAYFIELD, Justice.
Counsel for the appellee insist with great vigor that Section 6 of the Constitution of Alabama 1901 affords no protection against an abuse of “due process of law” except in criminal cases. In support of this position they cite the holding of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island in Sepe v. Daneker, 76 R.I. 160, 68 A.2d 101, and Taglianetti v. New England Tel. & Tel. Co., R.I., 1954, 103 A.2d 67, construing a provision of the Rhode Island Constitution similar to art. 1, § 6 of the Alabama Constitution of 1901. Regardless of what position the Supreme Court of Rhode…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shields v. Utah Idaho Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Simon v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Zeigler v. South & North Ala. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- State Ex Rel. Steele v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.