Legal Opinion

Shehy v. Cunningham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1909No. 11005Published

Error to the' Circuit Court of Mahoning county. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSummers, J.

In 1892 McLain Shehy died intestate, seized of certain lands, and left surviv*290ing him as his only heirs at law his widow since deceased, his son, the plaintiff, and his three daughters, the defendants.

After the father’s death certain of the lands were partitioned among the children, and other lands were sold for twenty thousand dollars, and the purchase money was paid to and retained by the three sisters. The brother brought this suit to recover his share. The sisters answered that in the year 1890, the father conveyed to the son by deed of general warranty, ninety-nine acres of land, that it…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. M'Crea v. PurmortCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Miller v. MaxwellNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Finley v. CathcartIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Morris v. TillsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Rockhill v. SpraggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API