Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Neyland v. Read

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 30, 1898No. Nos. 12,839 and 12,840PublishedCited by 6 opinions

QN APPLICATION for writs of Mandamus and Certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

Robert L. Belden sued the relator on a balance claimed as being due by her. The suit was brought before the magistrate of the Third Ward of Calcasieu.

The relator answered, and pleaded in reconvention an amount exceeding three hundred dollars.

Her demand in reconvention was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The court pronounced judgment for plaintiff Belden in the sum of fifty-five dollars and fifty cents. The defendant, the relator here, appealed to the District Court.

The relator further sets forth in her application for a mandamus that five…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rosine v. BonnabelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mouledoux v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  2. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. ReeseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. State v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. Gallman v. YoungLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Harkness v. Louisiana & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API