Legal Opinion

Daniel v. City of Clovis

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1929No. 3171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BICKLEY, C. J.

The city of Clovis enacted Ordinance No. 219 of said city, regulating the occupation of dray, transfer, taxicab, and storage warehouses, and pro7 vided a license fee therefor; said city was threatening to enforce said ordinance when this cause was filed and an order to show cause issued from the district court directed to appellee city, ordering it to show cause why it should not be restrained and enjoined from enforcing said ordinance. Judgment was rendered in favor of appellee, and appellant appeals. Appellant attacks the ordinance upon the ground that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Proposed Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Booth v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Ex Parte HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. City of Albuquerque v. Ranger Desdemona Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mares v. KoolNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  2. City of Clovis v. DendyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API