Legal Opinion

Centerville State Bank v. National Surety Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 3, 1928No. 754PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

This is an action at law brought by plaintiff to recover from defendant on a fiduciary bond. The amended petition seeks recovery of six items, aggregating $4,729.50. The demand in the original petition was for an aggregate of only $4,095.30. Other items not originally declared upon were added by the amended petition.

While it is seriously contended, even in the event a recovery can be had by" plaintiff in any amount certain of the items declared upon in the amended petition cannot be allowed to plaintiff; however, as by reason of the defense interposed, it is the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Fleckner v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  3. City Bank of New Haven v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. Blair v. Perpetual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  5. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Centerville State Bank v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API