Legal Opinion

Flangos v. Flangos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1039The appeals from the intermediate orders must be dismissed, because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the amended judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeals from the intermediate orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeals from the amended judgment and the order entered November 19, 2009.

The Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to impose obligations in the amended judgment upon the nonparty appellant. “A court has no power to grant relief against an entity not named as a party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Riverside Capital Advisors, Inc. v. First Capital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Global Connect Strategic Voice of Broadcasting, Corp. v. Oxford Collection Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Lake Anne Realty Corp. v. Lake Anne at Monroe Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weiner v. WeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Weiner v. WeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API