Muller v. Jensen

This is an actioii against a physician and surgeon to re*2cover damag-es for alleged malpractice. The case was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Plaintiff’s witnesses related the following factual situation : Plaintiff and his son were in an automobile accident on March 20, 1936. The son received an injured finger. The son, accompanied by the father, went to the defendant for treatment of the son’s injury on April 1. At that time the defendant volunteered to examine the. plaintiff for injuries to his body…