Legal Opinion

In Re Daniels

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1931No. Docket No. 2172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConret, P. J.

In accordance with decision this day announced from the bench the petitioner is discharged from custody.

By the complaint filed in the Municipal Court of the City of Long Beach the petitioner was charged with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, with the additional charge that he had theretofore twice been convicted of the like offense. On defendant’s plea of not guilty he was tried by the court without a jury. At the close of the trial the court found the defendant guilty as charged, without mention of the charges as to said prior convictions. Two days later when the defendant was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DueberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. In Re HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. People v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AsherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. YsabelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. People v. RomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. AhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API