Legal Opinion
Reedhycalog UK, Ltd. v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided March 27, 2008No. 6:06 CV 222PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are ReedHyealog UK, Ltd. and Grant Prideco, Inc.’s (collectively, “ReedHyealog”) Motion to Compel (Docket No. 289), Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc., Haliburton Energy Services Inc., and U.S. Synthetic Corporation’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Compel (Docket No. 290), Haliburton Energy Services Inc. (“Haliburton”) and U.S. Synthetic Corporation’s (“USS”) Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Answer (Docket No. 301), Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc.’s (“Baker Hughes”) Motion for Leave to File…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Timothy Alldread v. City of GrenadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Tsai-Son Nguyen v. Excel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- AHF Community Development, LLC v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- Grigson v. Farmers Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
- Lumenco, LLC v. Giesecke+Devrient GmbHDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2023