Legal Opinion · Dissent

Balent v. City of Wilkes-Barre

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1985No. Appeal, No. 2180 C.D. 1983Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish:

Joseph J. Balent and George Barto, Appellants, appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County dismissing their petition for the appointment of board of viewers. A building owned by the Appellants was damaged by fire and subsequently was demolished by the City of Wilkes-Barre (City).

Appellants contend that this demolition constituted a de facto taking and filed a petition for the appointment of viewers to assess damages. The City filed preliminary objections. Pursuant to the procedure in eminent domain cases, the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Borough of Green Tree v. Board of Property Assessments, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API