Legal Opinion

Fink v. New York Life Insurance

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 5, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWendel, J.

These two actions, pursuant to stipulation, were tried together. Each action was brought to recover double indemnity benefits under policies of life insurance. The policies provide that where the death of the insured results “ directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental causes,” a double indemnity benefit would be paid. Defendant has paid the face amount of the policies, but denies liability for double indemnity.

There is no substantial dispute as to the facts. The insured was a patient in the Montefiore Hospital in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitlatch v. . Fidelity and Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Weil v. Globe Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Hodgson v. Preferred Accident InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Martorella v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. White v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bolger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Shtevelan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  3. Weidy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API