Commonwealth v. Powell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
In Commonwealth v. Cheney, 440 Mass. 568, 574 (2003) (Cheney), we concluded that “judicial power does not extend to authorize a judge to dismiss an otherwise legally adequate indictment, prior to verdict, finding, or plea [over the *321Commonwealth’s objection], in the ‘interests of public justice.’ ” Our ruling was based on the principle of separation of powers, set forth in art. 30 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, that does not “permit judges to substitute their judgment as to whom and what crimes to prosecute, for the judgment of those who are constitutionally charged with that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DuquetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. John Dowdican's BailMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Commonwealth v. BrandanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. PylesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. RotondaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Magnus M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MosherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. WinfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. BerriosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- United States v. CuretCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.