Legal Opinion

Swift v. Wyatt

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 14, 1896No. 59PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Dickinson district court; M. B. Nicholson, judge. Action of replevin by Edward F. Swift and others, partners as Swift & Oo., against W. A. Wyatt. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs bring the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Clark, J. :

This is an action of replevin brought by Swift & Co. to recover from W. A. Wyatt the pos*555session of a span of mules, and damages for tlieir unlawful detention. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. A motion for a new trial, setting up the statutory grounds, was duly filed and overruled, to which the plaintiffs duly excepted. Judgment being rendered in favor of the defendant, the plaintiffs have brought the case to this court for review.

The error chiefly relied upon by the plaintiffs in error is the refusal of the court to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bickford v. ChamplinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  2. City of Lawrence v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API