Legal Opinion

Steel v. Holtzer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 11, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. . Action by Sam W. Steel against Max Holtzer. From a final order in summary proceedings awarding possession of the premises to the landlord on account of defendant’s failure to pay rent, the tenánt appeals.

1Per curiam

[ 1 ] An appeal has been taken to this court from a prior order in summary proceedings awarding possession of the identical premises involved in the proceeding to the landlord herein as against the tenant herein for default in payment of a prior install*644ment of rent. The appeal from the prior order was heard simultaneously with this appeal, and the final order has been disposed of. The validity of the second order, granting relief to the landlord which he has already obtained in the first, has accordingly become an academic question, as the affirmance or reversal of the second order would not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Simon v. BierbauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steel v. HoltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API