Legal Opinion

Midkiff v. Kincheloe

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1953No. 9118PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MB. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

Plaintiff owns land in Bosebud county requiring artificial irrigation. He has used the land since 1916 as a livestock ranch. He contends that he is entitled to the water, of Home creek which runs through his ranch but which is a dry creek except that it flows from the spring runoff of melting snows and when the rainfall is sufficient. His contention is that he has used the waters of the creek since 1916 by a system of levees or dikes for the irrigation of 80 acres. Defendant in June 1949 built a dam across the creek above the point where it enters plaintiff’s land, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TintingerMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Murray v. TingleyMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Clausen v. ArmingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Department of Natural Resources & Conservation of Montana, Water Resources DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the WaterMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the WaterMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Midkiff v. KincheloeMontana Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API