Legal Opinion

Carter v. Hutchens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1930No. 8 Div. 196PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The bill is filed by the Hutchens Company, a partnership, as a simple contract creditor of the estate of W. E. Willmarth, deceased, the administration of which was pending in the probate court, but as to which no steps had been taken for a final settlement. A removal of the administration from the probate into the equity court was sought and or-der so entered.

The demurrer to the amended bill rests upon the theory that complainant, a creditor, is not one of the class named in section 6478, Code 1923. The answer is that the bill is not rested upon that statute but upon the general jurisdiction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Devane v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Rensford v. Magnus & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Wood v. FinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Whaley v. Rothschild & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Tucker v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hill v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Mobile Cab & Baggage Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Irwin v. J. S. Reeves Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Lynne v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API