Legal Opinion · Dissent

John M. Barham, Jr. v. Mississippi Power Company

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2019No. 2017-CA-00158-SCTPublished

1Dissent

CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, DISSENTING:

¶24. The majority declares,

Whether it be an entrepreneur developing a shopping mall, a religious organization erecting a church, a major manufacturer building a plant encompassing multiple acres, or a young couple constructing their dream home, every landowner is protected from the depletion and destruction of the surface of their land and buildings they construct on their land from the adverse affect of surface coal-mining operations.

Maj. Op. ¶ 16. I do not disagree with this lofty declaration. I point out, however, that not one party is arguing that depletion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitten v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mississippi Transp. Com'n v. FiresMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. SnellgroveMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. WagleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp., Inc. v. MooneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API