Legal Opinion

Halliday v. Cienkowski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1938No. Appeal, 244PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the refusal to take off a judgment of nonsuit in an action of trespass for slanderous words. To the opinion of the court below * may he added the following cases, representative of the supporting decisions in other jurisdictions: De Santo v. De Nicola, 99 Conn. 717, 122 A. 708, and Warren v. Ray, 155 Mich. 91, 118 N. W. 741, both holding that such words are not libelous per se in the absence of special circumstances showing that the words were not used in their ordinary-meaning; and Terwilliger v. Wands, 17 N. Y. 54, holding that mental distress and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Terwilliger v. . WandsNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Desanto v. DenicolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Warren v. RayMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. Grand Central Sanitation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Branda v. SanfordNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Travers v. ShaneMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995
  4. Culverhouse v. Cooke Center for Learning & Development, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Humbertson v. Albright, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API