Legal Opinion
Videckis v. Pepperdine University
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 16, 2015No. Case No. CV 15-00298 DDP (JCx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Pepperdine University (“Pepperdine”)’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 13.) Having considered the parties’ submissions and heard oral argument, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Motion and adopts the following order.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs in this case are Haley Videckis (“Videckis”) and Layana White (“White”). Videckis is a former member of Pepper-dine’s women’s basketball…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Christiansen v. Omnicom Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- M.M. v. San Juan Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Walton v. Victor Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026