Legal Opinion
Gerald Faust, an Individual Faust Management Corporation, a Corporation v. The Travelers, a Corporation the Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1995No. 93-56338PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAMUEL P. KING, Senior District Judge:
Gerald Faust and Faust Management Corporation (collectively “Faust”) appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor .of Faust’s liability insurer, The Travelers (“Travelers”), in Faust’s action seeking reimbursement of certain attorneys’ fees, and other defense costs incurred during Faust’s defense of a lawsuit. Faust contends the district court erred by: (1) finding Travelers had no obligation to reimburse Faust for defense costs incurred by Faust before it tendered its defense to the insurer; (2) concluding that no genuine dispute of material…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Gribaldo, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A. G.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Northern Insurance Company of New York, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Moe v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Unigard InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Griffin v. Allstate Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Griffin v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Jamestown Builders, Inc. v. General Star Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.