Legal Opinion

Deacon v. City of Euless

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1966No. A-11263PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT, Chief Justice.

By their suit petitioners, W. Floyd Deacon, Priest Baze and C. O. Crumbley, plaintiffs in the trial court, sought judgment declaring City of Euless annexation ordinances Nos. 189, 190 and 192 void, and enjoining the City and its officers from levying taxes against their lands and otherwise attempting to exercise municipal jurisdiction over the same. The City of Euless answered the suit by plea in abatement and general denial. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion, granted the City’s-motion, and rendered judgment declaring the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mellinger v. City of Houston (Tex. 1-18-1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API