Legal Opinion
State v. Campbell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 1, 1993No. 14566PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The defendant, David Campbell, was charged with the crimes of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent pursuant to General Statutes § 21a-278 (b),1 possession *652of a weapon in a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes '§ 29-38, 2 and criminal impersonation in violation of General Statutes § 53a-130.3 The defendant pleaded not guilty to all three charges and elected a jury trial. At trial, the state nolled the charge of criminal impersonation and the court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss that charge. The court also granted the defendant’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United States v. Ronald BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. CorreaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. Scott M. Cain(074124)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.