Legal Opinion

State v. Terzado

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 6, 1987No. 86-3070PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence seized by police officers pursuant to a warrantless search of defendant George Terzado’s car. Terzado filed a motion to suppress the evidence on the ground that the police officer’s initial stop did not meet the requirements of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and that evidence *742seized during the ensuing search of the car was tainted and inadmissible. Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963). The trial court agreed and granted the motion. The state maintains that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. OliverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. State v. RizoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Branch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. State v. MayaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. MUHAMMAD v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  4. THOMAS HARGROVE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API