Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Cogdell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1919No. 9015PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Hood County Court; W. L. Dean, Judge. Action by H. B. Dorsey against B. H. Cogdell. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

This suit originated in the justice court, and was an action for damages for an alleged breach of contract on the part of the defendant, Cogdell, to purchase 4,000 bushels of corn at 83½ cents per bushel, to be delivered during the month of December, 1913. Judgment was rendered for defendant in the justice court, and also in the county court, and plaintiff has appealed.

Various assignments of error are presented in appellant’s brief, but we do not find it necessary to consider any question save that raised in the second assignment, to wit:

“The court erred in refusing to submit the case to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon Jones Const. Co. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. J. M. Guffey Petroleum Co. v. DinwiddieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Shaw v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Klyce v. GundlachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Rockwall County Levee Improvement District No. 3Texas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Carter v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Patterson v. Yellow Cab Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Watson v. CorleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API