Legal Opinion

State v. Richman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 7, 1997No. 37256-4-IPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

This shoplifting case requires us to decide whether the inevitable discovery rule satisfies the requirements of our Washington State Constitution. We find that the rule contains adequate safeguards to protect the privacy interests of Washington citizens and is therefore constitutional, that the rule was properly applied here, and therefore affirm.

Suppression Hearing

Allen Richman was convicted of first degree theft for stealing clothing from Littler’s clothing store. He contends that the court erred in admitting evidence that a belt and a pair of trousers were discovered in his briefcase.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. WintersteinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WintersteinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CatlettWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. Avila-AvinaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. LeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API