Legal Opinion

Malott v. Hart

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 7, 1988No. 3-87-0379PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Malott, brought suit against the defendant, William Dwight Hart, pursuant to the Animal Control Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 8, par. 351 et seq. (Act)). The Act provides in pertinent part:

“If a dog or other animal, without provocation, attacks or injures any person who is peaceably conducting himself in any place where he may lawfully be, the owner of such dog or other animal is liable in damages to such person for the full amount of the injury sustained.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 8, par. 366.)

The facts giving rise to the suit are as follows. The defendant is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. J & G Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nilsson v. NBD Bank of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Carl v. ResnickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Arient v. ShaikAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. Hladish v. WhitmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Kimble v. BeanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API