United States v. Acemoglu
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Darden, Chief Judge:
This case is here on certificate from the Judge Advocate General, United States Army, inquiring whether the Court of Military Review was correct in holding the accused’s plea of guilty to absence without leave to be improvident.1
During the plea proceedings, it was stipulated that the accused, then on orders to Vietnam, absented himself without leave on April 9, 1969, and remained so absent until he surrendered himself at the American Embassy, Ottawa, Canada, on December 8, 1970.
The Court of Military Review found the accused’s plea improvident on two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. WelkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. KitchenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. TredeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. PhillippeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. RaymoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. ReschCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. RayleU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.