Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clark v. Arakaki

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2008No. 26976Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion of

ACOBA, J.

I agree with the determination of the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit (the court) that the subject Charter Amendment (Amendment) should be prospectively applied with the first term of the four-term limit to begin following the election subsequent to the adoption of the Amendment. Term limits provisions not in existence but only ratified by voters in the same general election in which incumbents are elected should apply to the next election cycle. To hold otherwise wrongfully gives the term limits provision retrospective effect. See Taniguchi v. Ass’n of Apt.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Leslie v. Board of AppealsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Druggan v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Hayes v. GillHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Tax Appeal of Weinberg Ex Rel. WKH Corp. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API