Legal Opinion
Norman G. Hovlid v. Harley Asari and Mrs. Harley Asari, the Wil-Nes Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1962No. 17542PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the United States District Court upon motion of appellees. Appellant is the owner of Hovlid Letters Patent Nos. 2,748,075 1 and 2,868,525 2 both of which relate to an aquarium device. Appellant brought an action against appellees Harley Asari and Mrs. Harley Asari as customers of appellee Wil-Nes Corporation, charging infringement of his first and second patents. The Wil-Nes Corporation then brought an action against appellant for a declaratory judgment declaring appellant’s first and second patents invalid and not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cee-Bee Chemical Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Delco Chemicals, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Hayes Spray Gun Co. v. E. C. Brown Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Hughes Blades, Inc., a California Corporation, and Norman P. Van Valkenburgh v. Diamond Tool AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
3Cited by11 opinions
- Application of Ernst Johan Jens HenriksenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Proler Steel Corporation, Inc. v. Luria Brothers & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Sticker Industrial Supply Corp. v. Blaw-Knox Co. And A. J. Boynton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Droplets, Inc. v. Etrade BankCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.